is no more the vehicle of our values than religion or politics. But politics is the more fair and balanced of the three as long as none of the three dominate the message, four they will. The s'um is great than the duoh!
[Subtext or Con Text?]
A thought divided against itself.
[Field theory or spare the Rodney? ...speaking of Homer]
[Vector valuing dynamics]
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Rod. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Rod. Sort by date Show all posts
Tuesday, November 23, 2010
Monday, April 13, 2015
Spare the ROD
Read of Day ?*
Speaking of Spare...
* OMGOP
M^: A Shot in the Arm?, Neo-Perspectivism
^ 5th dimension : Tails Aside (sc) [ ? ]
OLO?
4-13-15 ?!? [~]
(fp?) mobius :A. THE TRUTH APPARENT: A MOBIUS LAP , B. , C. Too Random... , D. Re:Figure , E. Rough Riders , F. The Undisclosed Bunker Branch of the Government. G. Borrow and Twist- a surfing metaphor? , H. Stuart Smally Anyone? , I. RUNNING WITH RHETORIC .
Speaking of Spare...
* OMGOP
M^: A Shot in the Arm?, Neo-Perspectivism
^ 5th dimension : Tails Aside (sc) [ ? ]
OLO?
4-13-15 ?!? [~]
(fp?) mobius :A. THE TRUTH APPARENT: A MOBIUS LAP , B. , C. Too Random... , D. Re:Figure , E. Rough Riders , F. The Undisclosed Bunker Branch of the Government. G. Borrow and Twist- a surfing metaphor? , H. Stuart Smally Anyone? , I. RUNNING WITH RHETORIC .
Monday, December 01, 2014
Friday, January 11, 2013
No Drama
Obama...
better than all Bama OdeRama[!]or the Rumsfeld School of Infotainment(2) or Mad Ave.
That sure spins the tale(1) on the dawn key (3) !
(1) (b.s.) "English+only"
(2) Flap a Chino Rino? Or Up Swift Creak?
(3) not to be facetious but it seemed a battle of the "Fair and Balanced"('n aside of Cheney) with Scarborough burnishing his Rx and not liking his own medicine.
(verse us?) Re:Creaking?
SPEAKing of Re: I have a missing link to dig up. But MEANwhile... more on spare the Rod ne Danger Fields and Share N Angles..Or Fries with that.
Wednesday, September 10, 2008
"lipsticks and stones"
Context explained. Keith Olbermann Countdown"trotted out lightning rod" for foe claims of spelling (I mean sexism).
Watershed moment? NBC questions.
Irony noted: McCain has to explain context of Obama remark, already explained by Obama. Obama has to explain the remark, even as McCain Miss-took it, on Letterman. If it was about Palin, then she would be the lipstick, so it was really about the lipstick not the pig, which makes McCain calling Palin the pig. (Literally hiding behind more than just a skirt, but a Miss used aphorism.)
Has Obama "unleashed" 527's? I don't understand how they work. But liberal groups better not be using the tactics that McCain and his crowd are using.
Special Comment? Thank you, Keith Olbermann!
In Remembrance of September 11th.
Watershed moment? NBC questions.
Irony noted: McCain has to explain context of Obama remark, already explained by Obama. Obama has to explain the remark, even as McCain Miss-took it, on Letterman. If it was about Palin, then she would be the lipstick, so it was really about the lipstick not the pig, which makes McCain calling Palin the pig. (Literally hiding behind more than just a skirt, but a Miss used aphorism.)
Has Obama "unleashed" 527's? I don't understand how they work. But liberal groups better not be using the tactics that McCain and his crowd are using.
Special Comment? Thank you, Keith Olbermann!
In Remembrance of September 11th.
Thursday, November 11, 2010
Speaking of Timing
All posts are posted at the time indicated unless otherwise noted*, not always clearly, as updated or inserted**.
* saved-in-draft maintain original time with date posted indicated
** sometimes indicated by links
Sometimes bracketed material is a preface, and
now to the matters that triggered this tangent.
It was a surprise to me and others that the Debt Panel released its(or rather the co-chair's) plan, an interesting update to my comments in the update regarding the chart and debt. It is probable that the chart, may not include social security, and regarding medicare, off the chart going forward. But given the shotgun approach, not really a good metaphor(as aim is not the point), but as a matter of breadth and coverage, it is all over the map and "harpooned every whale"***. While the origin of the Debt Panel(link hopefully to be inserted)is in question, (was it Obama's or a Republican idea) it does seem to fit my theory of Obama. The solutions to our economy are very broad, and inter-related, and hinge on the balance of what government does, more particularly does it create jobs or the environment for the economy. The answer is usally, if not always, both to some degree. In this regard, any wholesale dismissal of the plan is in as much error as even calling it a plan. It seems a well crafted way to put everything on the table, not that it will all be called for or passed.
*** Simpson quote from Bloomberg link.
[Speaking of timing and updates and tangents, Fair Game is a movie noted in C-word post, but Decision Points(book) is the center of the Circumference. Somewhere there is a link that closes the circle.]
[Speaking of Spokes: Axel Rod?]
* saved-in-draft maintain original time with date posted indicated
** sometimes indicated by links
Sometimes bracketed material is a preface, and
now to the matters that triggered this tangent.
It was a surprise to me and others that the Debt Panel released its(or rather the co-chair's) plan, an interesting update to my comments in the update regarding the chart and debt. It is probable that the chart, may not include social security, and regarding medicare, off the chart going forward. But given the shotgun approach, not really a good metaphor(as aim is not the point), but as a matter of breadth and coverage, it is all over the map and "harpooned every whale"***. While the origin of the Debt Panel(link hopefully to be inserted)is in question, (was it Obama's or a Republican idea) it does seem to fit my theory of Obama. The solutions to our economy are very broad, and inter-related, and hinge on the balance of what government does, more particularly does it create jobs or the environment for the economy. The answer is usally, if not always, both to some degree. In this regard, any wholesale dismissal of the plan is in as much error as even calling it a plan. It seems a well crafted way to put everything on the table, not that it will all be called for or passed.
*** Simpson quote from Bloomberg link.
[Speaking of timing and updates and tangents, Fair Game is a movie noted in C-word post, but Decision Points(book) is the center of the Circumference. Somewhere there is a link that closes the circle.]
[Speaking of Spokes: Axel Rod?]
Friday, November 30, 2012
"FACT: References To Al Qaeda Were Removed To Protect National Security ..."
Speaking of Twits.
http://mediamatters.org/research/2012/11/30/myths-and-facts-about-the-conservative-medias-w/191597
No disrespect*, just lede or ship.
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2011/11/it-is-hard-to-say-herman-means-anything.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2011/09/true-ledership.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2011/05/calm-pend-e-um.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2012/08/guns-gads-and-google.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2012/11/blogspot-has-new-blogger.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2012/01/in-begining.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2011/09/muffin-gate.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2011/10/walking-plank.html
*http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=spare+the+rod
Spare the jargonaut: actually I am sparing the footnote page or rather (fn) and bibliotechnogarble**.[^]
Bottomline, I am being relatively brief in this briefing which reminds me to add label Media Matters, which is the prime source from which I cut-and-paste the "headline". Also adding Share 'n Angle, GPS, and Objectivism. BooYah!
** I will note that I have added new labels: Susan Rice, UN Ambassador, and National Security. It may be hard to believe I have not already use the last one but it is so broad a category, somewhat akin to Intelligence another non label***. ALSO NOTE: anacronistic insertions or embed links @* as in scroll over each and find b.s.(blogsearch) and flip-flop as I have sourced these.
(fn)TBA ^
*** OK, I was wrong. I had used the "Intelligence" label and so I will^ now.
^ alternate anachronistic asterisk: "Ineffable" cuts both ways, Re:(fn) "jargonauts" and TBA's.[^]
[editors note: I did edit the placement of bracketeds(deleted forboldin') and asterisks.]
FYI: "lede" = journalistic term AND ship? = the boat we are all in.
http://mediamatters.org/research/2012/11/30/myths-and-facts-about-the-conservative-medias-w/191597
No disrespect*, just lede or ship.
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2011/11/it-is-hard-to-say-herman-means-anything.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2011/09/true-ledership.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2011/05/calm-pend-e-um.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2012/08/guns-gads-and-google.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2012/11/blogspot-has-new-blogger.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2012/01/in-begining.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2011/09/muffin-gate.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2011/10/walking-plank.html
*http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=spare+the+rod
Spare the jargonaut: actually I am sparing the footnote page or rather (fn) and bibliotechnogarble**.[^]
Bottomline, I am being relatively brief in this briefing which reminds me to add label Media Matters, which is the prime source from which I cut-and-paste the "headline". Also adding Share 'n Angle, GPS, and Objectivism. BooYah!
** I will note that I have added new labels: Susan Rice, UN Ambassador, and National Security. It may be hard to believe I have not already use the last one but it is so broad a category, somewhat akin to Intelligence another non label***. ALSO NOTE: anacronistic insertions or embed links @* as in scroll over each and find b.s.(blogsearch) and flip-flop as I have sourced these.
(fn)TBA ^
*** OK, I was wrong. I had used the "Intelligence" label and so I will^ now.
^ alternate anachronistic asterisk: "Ineffable" cuts both ways, Re:(fn) "jargonauts" and TBA's.[^]
[editors note: I did edit the placement of bracketeds(deleted forboldin') and asterisks.]
FYI: "lede" = journalistic term AND ship? = the boat we are all in.
Thursday, July 19, 2012
"you people..."?
Skirting the dignity.
Ann Romney claims it is below* the dignity of the President for his campaign to follow the money.
"beneath his dignity..."!?!?
We can't get beneath your dignity !
You can't handle the dignity.
Show me the dignity...
not the face of the down troddin'!
Ann Romney claims it is below* the dignity of the President for his campaign to follow the money.
"beneath his dignity..."!?!?
We can't get beneath your dignity !
You can't handle the dignity.
Show me the dignity...
not the face of the down troddin'!
Know the difference between cause and affect, between foundational and founding, between digging and building.
[Lean Forward]
[MB Jonathan Capeheart Romney editing, which I would call Rumsfeldian die-a-log.]
[Hardball: Braking bad? "Bachmann-Beck Overdrive." "It's not about the ad...": Flackery on Flackery.]
Enough puns on why they break their English. It seems that the Romney's(or Republican's) cannot afford be honest about how the economy works, let alone the immigration and emmigration of their beliefs**.
[MB Jonathan Capeheart Romney editing, which I would call Rumsfeldian die-a-log.]
[Hardball: Braking bad? "Bachmann-Beck Overdrive." "It's not about the ad...": Flackery on Flackery.]
Enough puns on why they break their English. It seems that the Romney's(or Republican's) cannot afford be honest about how the economy works, let alone the immigration and emmigration of their beliefs**.
* more awkward English?
** "trickle down anyone"?
Friday, May 23, 2008
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)